We are living in a time of profound skepticism and radical distrust. Trust in core institutions and expertise—from scientists and economists to the government itself—is at an historic low, challenging the very foundation of our society.

This challenge is amplified by structures like social media algorithms that filter information and create separate realities, making it effortless to circulate distortions and difficult to encounter balanced evidence.

And yet, in this era defined by skepticism, many of us seem to exhibit an unquestioning loyalty to a political party or partisan figure, often setting aside the established evidence presented by credentialed experts.

Why this profound contradiction?

We reject the specialist who dedicated their life to a complex field, yet we are willing to trust certain high-profile figures on economic policy—even when non-partisan analysis suggests the outcomes may be harmful.

Many of us prioritize party identity: party over principle, party over the interests of our neighbors, party over everything else.

Why is it that we often gravitate toward voices who seem to benefit from or profit from our deepest anxieties—figures whose actions appear inconsistent with the principles or faith they claim to uphold?

If we truly prioritize principle, how do we reconcile deep loyalty to our leaders with evidence that suggests their priorities lie elsewhere?

Partisanship may not just be limiting; it may be an engineered tool.

The extent to which it has permeated our national conversation is alarming because it makes us collectively vulnerable.

What if the partisan leaders we trust have been intentionally sowing doubt about expertise?

Is the ultimate goal to silence those who present inconvenient facts, or to create an environment where sweeping changes can be enacted without scrutiny?

What if our loyalty is being leveraged to promote agendas that are not in our collective best interest?

---

If the currency of political loyalty is the dismissal of verifiable truth, what value are we truly receiving in return?

These are thoughts we all must genuinely consider before it’s too late.